‘i’m with wolfowitz’ writes george monbiot this week. and having read his article i agree with him.
thank you once again george for brilliantly demolishing the consensus. read what he has to say
UPDATED: my brother pointed out that although the title is meant to be antagonistic / ironic – it is rather dangerous to suggest (even in jest) that someone such as wolfowitz could actually be any good for the world. george’s assumption that the extreme nature of wolfowitz might hasten the demise of the world bank, thus saving lives / dignity in the long run, is a dangerous extrapolation into an unkown future. fair point mike – i agree.
Published: 5 April 2005 at 10:03am | This entry was posted in sustainability
‘i’m with wolfowitz’
‘i’m with wolfowitz’ writes george monbiot this week. and having read his article i agree with him.
thank you once again george for brilliantly demolishing the consensus. read what he has to say
UPDATED: my brother pointed out that although the title is meant to be antagonistic / ironic – it is rather dangerous to suggest (even in jest) that someone such as wolfowitz could actually be any good for the world. george’s assumption that the extreme nature of wolfowitz might hasten the demise of the world bank, thus saving lives / dignity in the long run, is a dangerous extrapolation into an unkown future. fair point mike – i agree.