<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: the scale of china</title>
	<atom:link href="http://minktoast.net/2008/01/17/the-scale-of-china/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://minktoast.net/2008/01/17/the-scale-of-china/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 12 Jan 2012 11:02:21 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Simon B</title>
		<link>http://minktoast.net/2008/01/17/the-scale-of-china/comment-page-1/#comment-225</link>
		<dc:creator>Simon B</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Jan 2008 21:50:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://minktoast.net/2008/01/17/the-scale-of-china/#comment-225</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Ah, don&#039;t be such a doom-monger! According to Gordon Brown in &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.guardian.co.uk/china/story/0,,2243367,00.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;this Guardian article&lt;/a&gt;, China is &quot;part of the solution&quot;. Why? Because they are building &quot;a low-carbon fossil fuel power station&quot;.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Yes, that&#039;s right, one whole low-carbon power station! That should cancel out those 2000twh no problems.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Ummm, by the way, can anybody actually tell me what a &quot;low carbon fossil fuel&quot; power station actually is without using the word &#039;oxymoron&#039;...?&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ah, don&#8217;t be such a doom-monger! According to Gordon Brown in <a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/china/story/0,,2243367,00.html" rel="nofollow">this Guardian article</a>, China is &#8220;part of the solution&#8221;. Why? Because they are building &#8220;a low-carbon fossil fuel power station&#8221;.</p>
<p>Yes, that&#8217;s right, one whole low-carbon power station! That should cancel out those 2000twh no problems.</p>
<p>Ummm, by the way, can anybody actually tell me what a &#8220;low carbon fossil fuel&#8221; power station actually is without using the word &#8216;oxymoron&#8217;&#8230;?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

